Skip to main content

GuideStrategyIntermediate30 min

A Strategy Index for Speaking Purposes

Select planning frames for advice, experience, scenes, predictions, comparisons, difficult situations, opinions, and unusual descriptions.

What you'll learn

  • Match response structure to communication purpose.
  • Use evidence from structured visuals accurately.
  • Adapt tone for supportive, persuasive, and difficult interactions.

Choose a task frame

Advice works well as recommendation, reasons, actions, and backup. Personal experience uses setting, sequence, result, and lesson. Scene description uses overview and spatial route; prediction links clue, likely event, and consequence. Comparison identifies shared priorities, weighs options, acknowledges the alternative, and persuades. Difficult situations need acknowledgement, neutral explanation, workable proposal, support, and fallback. Opinions need position, distinct reasons, response to concern, and qualified close.

Example
Situation
A double-booked room must be discussed with the presenter being moved.
In practice
Frame: own error; recognize valid confirmation; explain space constraint without ranking groups; offer equipped smaller room plus staff support; provide reschedule/refund fallback.
Why it works
The frame combines empathy and decision-making rather than giving a cold logistical announcement.

Try this

  1. Identify the purpose before noting content.
  2. Select the matching frame and three strongest details.
  3. Adjust opening and close to the listener relationship.

Use visual data as evidence

For scenes, organize by region and describe relationships, not a random inventory. For predictions, pair each forecast with a visible clue and use probability language. For comparison, connect attributes to the listener's priorities instead of reading cards aloud. Unusual situations need stable landmarks, concrete sensory features, public reactions, and an explanation of what makes the event distinctive. Do not invent names, histories, motives, or dramatic outcomes absent from the visual data.

Example
Situation
Dark clouds approach an outdoor book sale while volunteers cover bins and an empty cart sits near open library doors.
In practice
Prediction: staff may relocate books indoors because rain has started, protective action is underway, and transport plus an indoor destination are visible.
Why it works
Multiple clues support a cautious connected prediction.

Try this

  1. Group visible details by region or option.
  2. Attach every prediction or comparison to evidence.
  3. Use may, likely, or probably when outcomes are uncertain.

Tactics to keep

  • Memorize frame names, not sample sentences.
  • Use spatial order for scene tasks.
  • Use shared priorities for comparison and persuasion.
  • Use acknowledgement plus action for difficult interactions.

Common pitfalls

  • Applying an opinion structure to a personal story.
  • Reading visual cards without comparing significance.
  • Inventing unsupported events in a scene or prediction.

Practice prompts

  1. Prompt 1

    Sort sixteen original prompts across eight speaking purposes.

    Name the ideal frame and one tone requirement for each.

    Check yourself

    • Frames differ by purpose.
    • Tone matches listener.
    • No sentence templates are required.
  2. Prompt 2

    Use one structured scene and one comparison card.

    Create region notes for the scene and priority notes for the comparison, then speak for one minute each.

    Check yourself

    • Scene follows space.
    • Comparison follows priorities.
    • Evidence is accurate.

What's next

Apply this strategy in scored practice, or continue with the next lesson.

Independent CELPIP-style practice material. This is not an official CELPIP question.